Showing posts with label journalism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label journalism. Show all posts

Monday, August 18, 2014

The growing pay gap between journalism and public relations

http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2014/08/11/the-growing-pay-gap-between-journalism-and-public-relations/

In 2013, according to BLS data, public relations specialists earned a median annual income of $54,940 compared with $35,600 for reporters. In other words, journalists on average earn just 65% of what those in public relations earn. That is a greater income gap than in 2004 when journalists were paid 71 cents of every dollar earned by those in public relations ($43,830 versus $31,320).




Wednesday, April 2, 2014

data journalism - http://fivethirtyeight.com/

http://fivethirtyeight.com/

http://www.niemanlab.org/2014/03/this-week-in-review-nate-silver-and-data-journalisms-critics-and-the-roots-of-diversity-problems/

Friday, December 20, 2013

PREDICTIONS FOR JOURNALISM 2014: A NIEMAN LAB SERIES

http://www.niemanlab.org/collection/predictions-2014/

PABLO BOCZKOWSKI
“The year ahead might bring news organizations that will pay more attention to the public. While that might be good for their bottom lines, it might also be bad for the quality of our democratic life.”


CORY HAIK
“Now is the time to push the boundaries and use the best of those worlds in the service of storytelling.”


MARTIN LANGEVELD
“No grand strategy, no new business models for news will emerge from Omaha. Ultimately, these papers will be closed or sold.”


SUE SCHARDT
“We will begin to see fresh faces and hear new and unexpected voices on public media platforms that will grow over time.”


ED O'KEEFE
“Instagram, Facebook, Vine, Twitter, and Snapchat (srsly) are news mediums — because that’s where the audience is.”


REYHAN HARMANCI
“The most successful media companies have figured out how to translate their core ideas into any number of forms.”


ELIZABETH GREEN
“More niche nonprofit news organizations will be unmistakably good for democracy. The more knowledgeable our news sources, the more knowledgeable we can be as citizens and policymakers.”


JASON KOTTKE
“The Stream might be on the wane but still it dominates. All media on the web and in mobile apps has blog DNA in it and will continue to for a long while.”


JENNA WORTHAM
“The demand is there if the experience is new enough and original enough.”


JAMES ROBINSON
“2014 is the year that newsrooms will begin to think of analytics as a way to increase the quality of their readership, not just thequantity.”


TASNEEM RAJA
“The levels of wit, critical thinking, domain knowledge, netspeak literacy, digital acumen — and, of course, diversity — on display in these conversations should have editors sitting up and taking note.”


JUSTIN AUCIELLO
“Covering the realities of everyday life — car accidents, house fires, general police activity, weather emergencies — is well suited to the citizen journalist.”


CARRIE BROWN-SMITH
“The startups most likely to succeed will be those that are closest to their communities and that have an intimate understanding of their readers’ information-seeking behaviors and motivations.”


LAUREN RABAINO
“We’re limiting the opportunity for our readers to understand all the intersecting impacts by reducing context to a few paragraphs of background.”


KATIE ZHU
“Newsrooms are going to start thinking about responsive in terms of tailoring experiences based on a reader’s context in the physical world.”


RICK EDMONDS
“One- or two-time visitors are not a business opportunity — they are an accident.”


EVAN SMITH
“The hand-wringing about native advertising will give way to hand-clapping at the prospect of someone paying for serious journalism.”


RASMUS KLEIS NIELSEN
“When it comes to the future of news, as when it comes to so many other things, it is worth following the money.”


SARAH MARSHALL
“News sites will find new ways to use social media to surface stories from the archives and extend the lifecycle of content.”


ADRIENNE LAFRANCE
“Just imagine having a beat not tethered to a physical place or set topic, but an abstract and ever-changing linked set of ideas that you get to explore in real-time with other curious people.”


HASSAN HODGES
“The initial consumer of content is increasingly not human. The consumer is software, and software’s favorite food is data.”


MANDY BROWN
“No story should depend upon the presence of videos and other interactive elements; stripped of all styles and embeds, a story should remain readable and compelling on its own.”


JIM SCHACHTER
“Our news reports and stories increasingly will be produced and packaged in forms divorced from the formats dictated by a radio clock.”


DAMON KIESOW
“Apple has once again short-circuited an entire industry and started a land grab to connect the realms of digital advertising and physical transactions.”


MATT HAUGHEY
“In the end, they spark important conversations about important topics, and those conversations don’t feel lessened if and when an original story gets undermined.”


MARIA BUSTILLOS
“The most interesting thing about the cream rising to the top faster is that the best writers on a given subject can find each other faster.”


MATT WAITE
“It’s a matter of time — and I think that time is 2014 — until a paparazzo with no training and a drone bought off the Internet crashes into a very pretty face.”


PHILIP BUMP
“We’ve proven to be relatively bad at verifying authenticity in the face of a culture that seems weirdly amused by tricking the press.”


JENNIFER BRANDEL
“Audience engagement techniques will begin shifting away from the mindset of ‘What can they do for us?’ to ‘What can we do for them?’”


JAN SCHAFFER
“Let’s stop the handwringing about losses in legacy journalism and work on creating and growing the next acts in media.”


ERIKA OWENS
“In 2014, we’ll all need to challenge ourselves to more publicly share and document not just how we deal with insecurity, but how we build our skills, networks, and confidence.”


SCOTT KLEIN
“Every skill you don’t have leaves a whole class of stories out of your reach. And data stories are usually the ones that are hiding in plain sight.”


ALLEN TAN
“Institution-making is a messy process, but it doesn’t have to be a lonely one.”


MICHAEL SCHUDSON
“The answer will be what it has been since Walter Lippmann got it right 90 years ago.”


FIONA SPRUILL
“Smart journalists should experiment now, because at least one of these devices will move out of the geeks-only realm before we know it.”


RAJU NARISETTI

“The privileged status a newsroom enjoys ought to come with accountability and a responsibility to help sustain both journalism and the business of journalism.”

Monday, December 2, 2013

This online journalism startup raised $1.7M in crowdfunding and you’ve never heard of it


raising $1.7 million and signing up close to 24,000 subscribers in the Netherlands is pretty significant, considering the country only has about 16 million people.


Daily, but going beyond 'today's latest'
De Correspondent will publish fresh stories on a daily basis, but it aims to uncover, explain and highlight deep-lying structures and long-term developments that powerfully shape our world, rather than speculating about the latest hype, scare, or breaking news story.

From 'news' to 'new'
De Correspondent prioritizes relevance over recentness; looks for alternative ways of doing journalism; is transparent about its journalistic choices and dilemmas; values thorough fact-checking; and takes the ways in which news media shape our perceptions of events into account in its own reporting.

Ideals over ideology
De Correspondent recognizes and values the fact that its authors are no objective automatons who are out there recording 'the truth'; rather, they are subjective beings, rooted in and motivated by ideas and ideals. While correspondents will be expected to be factual, accurate, and fair in their reporting, they are not expected to hide the surprise, hope, anger, or enthusiasm that gave rise to this reporting in the first place.

Themes and connections
Believing that traditional divisions of news into such categories as 'national,' 'international,' 'politics,' ‘business,' etc., no longer make sense in an increasingly globalized and networked world, De Correspondent aims for its authors to report on themes that transcend such classic beats – including, for instance, energy, privacy, or the economy of the future.

Journalism before profit
De Correspondent is a commercial, for-profit enterprise, but its business model focuses on selling content to readers, rather than selling readers to advertisers. Subscription fees and donations are its main source of income, and at least twenty per cent of revenue will be invested in further developing the platform. The ultimate goal is to improve journalism, not to fill the pockets of shareholders.

From Readers to Participants
De Correspondent wants to establish a lasting and meaningful relationship with its readers. Conceived of as 'members' rather than 'subscribers,' readers will be asked for their opinion regarding the investment of new funds, as well as to contribute their expertise on specific topics. While vigilant about its editorial independence, De Correspondent believes that a unidirectional, one-to-many relationship between a news medium and its readership is wholly of the past, and that active audience involvement is crucial for maintaining a healthy, thriving platform.

Partners, not advertisers
To prevent becoming 'advertiser-oriented,' De Correspondent has the subscription fees paid by readers – currently € 60 a year – as its main source of income. De Correspondent is open to entering into partnerships with third parties, like universities or research institutes, but these partners will have no stake in the profitability of De Correspondent, and De Correspondent will be fully transparent about the nature and terms of such partnerships.

Like-minded people, not target audiences
Being ad-free, De Correspondent doesn't have to think about a 'target audience' and tailor its content accordingly, focusing, for instance, on topics that might interest 25-to-40-year olds with lots of money. Instead, anyone who believes in the vision and mission of De Correspondent is welcome to join; De Correspondent sees its readers as curious individuals who cannot be reduced to a set of categories.

Ambitious in ideals, modest in claims
De Correspondent does not pretend to constitute a substitute for existing, 'old' or 'mainstream' media; rather, it intends to supplement those media, filling a gap in the current news landscape by looking beyond, above and behind the daily news grind. Being an addition rather than a replacement, De Correspondent will happily collaborate with other outlets if such collaboration seems fruitful and worthwhile.

Fully digital
De Correspondent is a digital medium available on desktop, tablet and smartphone; in time, it will also offer apps for Android, iOS and other operating systems. Sharing articles with non-members will be possible to a limited extent. The precise form and technicalities of the platform take shape through ongoing experimentation, as De Correspondent, together with design agency Momkai, searches for those formats and technical specifications that suit online journalism in the very best way.

Blogger or journalist

Journalistic lines in the sand. Terry talks with two journalists and occasional bloggers about what makes a journalist. Can a blogger be one?


Friday, February 24, 2012

허울뿐인 객관성은 가라

http://www.journalist.or.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=28079


[언론다시보기] 변상욱 CBS 대기자


2012년 02월 22일 (수) 15:44:05


저널리즘의 사명이자 주요 기능 중 하나가 환경에 대한 감시이다. 권력과 자본으로 대표되는 힘이 남용되거나 부적절하게 사용되지 않도록 감시하고 견제하고 고발하는 것이 민주공화체제 저널리즘의 임무이다. 그 임무는 취재 보도를 통해 사실과 진실을 드러내고 논평을 통해 문제를 지적하며 대안과 방향을 제시함으로써 수행한다. 

그러나 정치·사회적 진실은 몇 겹의 장벽에 의해 가려져 있고 그리로 접근하는 길은 책략에 의해 숨겨져 있다. 언론이 진실을 전달하는 데 어려움을 겪는 이유이고 실패하는 이유이기도 하다. 그래서 저널리즘에서는 심층에 이르기 위해 비평과 폭로, 탐사 등 보다 전문적인 기능을 키우려 노력해 왔다. 

그러나 비평과 폭로, 탐사 보도를 막아서며 제기되는 문제가 객관성과 공정성이다. 우리는 그 대표적인 예로 PD수첩의 광우병 보도를 떠올릴 수 있을 것이다. 

‘언론은 객관적 설명만 하고 판단은 독자가 하도록 한다’는 나름 설득력 있는 명제가 우리를 제한해 왔다. 이를 바탕으로 객관주의 내지는 계량주의 언론 시대가 오래도록 유지되어 왔다. 그러나 계량주의와 객관주의에 함몰된 보도는 비본질적 보도로 진실을 회피하는 결과를 낳고 말았다. 

고전적으로도 객관성과 공정성은 양측을 동등하게 다루는 것을 의미하는 건 아니다. 계량주의 언론의 종주국인 미국마저도 FCC나 편집 규약 등에는 공정하면서도 진실에 접근하기 위해 나름의 원칙과 장치들을 강조해 왔다. 

‘1. 해석과 판단의 요건 △광범위한 의견을 수렴한다. △각 견해의 진실성과 비중을 따져 판단한다. △시대의 변화를 인정하고 수렴한다.’ 
두 번째 항목인 각 견해의 진실성과 비중을 고려하라는 내용이 바로 산술적이고 기계적인 중립, 진부한 양시양비론을 피하라는 충고이다.

‘2. 공정성의 유지 △사실은 신성불가침이다. △산술적 균형을 지양한다. △모호한 중립과 초연함은 배제되어야 한다.’

우리는 흔히 여당이 주장한 것 한 줄에 야당이 주장한 것 한 줄이면 객관성을 확보했고 균형이 맞았다고 여기며 기사를 써왔다. 여당은 1곳뿐이고 야당은 여럿이므로 야당의 논평과 주장을 모두 인용하는 것은 불공정하다고 여겨 야당 논평은 뭉뚱그려 쓰기도 했다. 

그러나 정당의 대변인은 근거 없는 폭로를 뻔뻔스러운 얼굴로 꺼내 놓는다. 사실을 은폐하며 거짓을 말하기도 한다. 최근의 예로 새누리당 돈봉투 사건의 당사자 가운데 비리 의혹이 일었을 때 처음부터 사실대로 이야기한 사람은 아무도 없다. 국회의장이고 대통령실 수석임에도 모든 것을 감추고 따돌렸다. 그 밑의 비서관들도 모두 궁지에 몰리자 하나씩 꺼내 놓았다. 기자들은 그저 거짓말을 순서대로 따라가며 당사자의 처분만을 기다려야 했다. 실제로 우리의 보도를 살피면 기자들은 그 말이 거짓이건, 아니건 좀처럼 문제 삼지 않는다. 박희태의 해명을 땄으면 되고, 김효재의 목소리를 담아냈으면 충분하다는 태도들로 대부분 일관하고 있다. 

정말 그 인물이 그 자리에서 분명히 그렇게 말했고 기자는 들은 대로 썼으니 기자는 역할을 다한 것일까? 과연 데스크에게 정당하다고 인정받을 수 있을까? 아니 데스크가 요구하는 것이 바로 그것일지도 모르겠다. 그렇다면 독자와 시청취자에게 당당히 최선을 다했다 주장할 수 있는 걸까? 그 인물들의 발언을 분석과 추측을 통해, 논리적 추론에 의해 반박하고 의심하며 기사에 반영하면 부적절한 저널리즘에 빠지는 걸까? 

총선 국면에 접어들면서 가장 시급한 것은 이런 보도 태도의 반성이라 여겨진다. 득표를 위해서라면 무엇이든 다 해주겠다고 허언을 쏟아놓는 여야 공약과 폭로비방에 대해 최소한 받아쓰기를 넘어서는 책임있는 보도를 해야 한다. 진실성과 현실성을 가능한 선까지 검증해야 한다. 분명히 이야기 했으니 받아 적고 여당 것을 써줬으니 야당 것도 써주면 된다고? 형식적 객관성은 확보했는지 모르지만 기사는 진실로부터 멀어진다. 이것만은 아닐 것이다. 

어떤 결론에 이르든 좋다. 이제 이 모든 것들에 의문을 가져 보자. 그러라고 배우고 지시 받은 것에 대해 의심해 보자. 고민한 다음 기자의 양식에 따르면 된다. 진정으로 고민했다면 그것으로 충분하다.

Tuesday, September 13, 2011

computer replaces human jobs - journalists and insurance companies

In Case You Wondered, a Real Human Wrote This 

 http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/11/business/computer-generated-articles-are-gaining-traction.html?_r=1&ref=business

 The clever code is the handiwork of Narrative Science, a start-up in Evanston, Ill., that offers proof of the progress of artificial intelligence — the ability of computers to mimic human reasoning.

 
video platformvideo managementvideo solutionsvideo player

Supercomputer Watson Cures the Sick?